H225 Super Puma vs 206L-4 LongRanger
The H225 Super Puma leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Airbus Helicopters H225 Super Puma (introduced 2004) beside the Bell Textron 206L-4 LongRanger (introduced 1992) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are helicopters, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the H225 Super Puma carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
H225 Super Puma vs 206L-4 LongRanger: the key differences
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 67% more range (H225 Super Puma: 540 nm; 206L-4 LongRanger: 324 nm).
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 29% more cruise speed (H225 Super Puma: 142 kt; 206L-4 LongRanger: 110 kt).
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 171% more passenger capacity (H225 Super Puma: 19 seats; 206L-4 LongRanger: 7 seats).
- The H225 Super Puma is the newer design (introduced 2004 versus 1992 for the 206L-4 LongRanger), a gap of 12 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (24,251 lbs versus 4,450 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the H225 Super Puma runs 2 engines against 1 on the 206L-4 LongRanger — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the H225 Super Puma seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 206L-4 LongRanger can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
H225 Super Puma vs 206L-4 LongRanger: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the H225 Super Puma or the 206L-4 LongRanger?
The H225 Super Puma has the longer published range — 540 nm versus 324 nm for the 206L-4 LongRanger.
Does the H225 Super Puma or 206L-4 LongRanger seat more passengers?
The H225 Super Puma carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 19 seats, compared with 7 on the 206L-4 LongRanger.
Which is faster, the H225 Super Puma or the 206L-4 LongRanger?
The H225 Super Puma cruises faster, at 142 kt versus 110 kt for the 206L-4 LongRanger.
Which is newer, the H225 Super Puma or the 206L-4 LongRanger?
The H225 Super Puma is the newer design, introduced in 2004 versus 1992 for the 206L-4 LongRanger.
Is the H225 Super Puma or the 206L-4 LongRanger the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft — 24,251 lbs versus 4,450 lbs for the 206L-4 LongRanger.
Should I buy the H225 Super Puma or the 206L-4 LongRanger?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 206L-4 LongRanger can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the H225 Super Puma vs 206L-4 LongRanger?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.