H225 Super Puma vs S-76D
The H225 Super Puma leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Airbus Helicopters H225 Super Puma (introduced 2004) against the Sikorsky S-76D (introduced 2012) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are helicopters, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the H225 Super Puma carries more passengers. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
H225 Super Puma vs S-76D: the key differences
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 31% more range (H225 Super Puma: 540 nm; S-76D: 411 nm).
- The S-76D delivers 9% more cruise speed (H225 Super Puma: 142 kt; S-76D: 155 kt).
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 46% more passenger capacity (H225 Super Puma: 19 seats; S-76D: 13 seats).
- The S-76D is the newer design (introduced 2012 versus 2004 for the H225 Super Puma), a gap of 8 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (24,251 lbs versus 11,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the H225 Super Puma seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The S-76D can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
H225 Super Puma vs S-76D: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the H225 Super Puma or the S-76D?
The H225 Super Puma has the longer published range — 540 nm versus 411 nm for the S-76D.
Does the H225 Super Puma or S-76D seat more passengers?
The H225 Super Puma carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 19 seats, compared with 13 on the S-76D.
Which is faster, the H225 Super Puma or the S-76D?
The S-76D cruises faster, at 155 kt versus 142 kt for the H225 Super Puma.
Which is newer, the H225 Super Puma or the S-76D?
The S-76D is the newer design, introduced in 2012 versus 2004 for the H225 Super Puma.
Is the H225 Super Puma or the S-76D the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft — 24,251 lbs versus 11,700 lbs for the S-76D.
Should I buy the H225 Super Puma or the S-76D?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The S-76D can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the H225 Super Puma vs S-76D?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.