ATR 72-600 vs CRJ700
The CRJ700 leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the ATR ATR 72-600 (introduced 2009) beside the Bombardier Aviation CRJ700 (introduced 2001) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the CRJ700 has the advantage. undefined
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
ATR 72-600 vs CRJ700: the key differences
- The CRJ700 delivers 67% more range (ATR 72-600: 825 nm; CRJ700: 1,378 nm).
- The CRJ700 delivers 72% more cruise speed (ATR 72-600: 275 kt; CRJ700: 473 kt).
- The ATR 72-600 and CRJ700 are evenly matched on passenger capacity, both at 78 seats.
- The ATR 72-600 is the newer design (introduced 2009 versus 2001 for the CRJ700), a gap of 8 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The CRJ700 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (75,000 lbs versus 50,706 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The CRJ700 is the stronger fit for regional and short-to-medium legs — its 1,378 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The ATR 72-600, at 825 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the ATR 72-600's range, the CRJ700's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
Choose the CRJ700 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the ATR 72-600 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the CRJ700 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
More comparisons
ATR 72-600 vs CRJ700: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the ATR 72-600 or the CRJ700?
The CRJ700 has the longer published range — 1,378 nm versus 825 nm for the ATR 72-600.
Which is faster, the ATR 72-600 or the CRJ700?
The CRJ700 cruises faster, at 473 kt versus 275 kt for the ATR 72-600.
Which is newer, the ATR 72-600 or the CRJ700?
The ATR 72-600 is the newer design, introduced in 2009 versus 2001 for the CRJ700.
Is the ATR 72-600 or the CRJ700 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the CRJ700 is the larger aircraft — 75,000 lbs versus 50,706 lbs for the ATR 72-600.
Should I buy the ATR 72-600 or the CRJ700?
Choose the CRJ700 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the ATR 72-600 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the CRJ700 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
Still weighing up the ATR 72-600 vs CRJ700?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.