787-10 Dreamliner vs C919
The 787-10 Dreamliner leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 787-10 Dreamliner (introduced 2018) beside the COMAC C919 (introduced 2023) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the 787-10 Dreamliner has the advantage. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
787-10 Dreamliner vs C919: the key differences
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 192% more range (787-10 Dreamliner: 6,430 nm; C919: 2,200 nm).
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 9% more cruise speed (787-10 Dreamliner: 488 kt; C919: 447 kt).
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 129% more passenger capacity (787-10 Dreamliner: 440 seats; C919: 192 seats).
- The C919 is the newer design (introduced 2023 versus 2018 for the 787-10 Dreamliner), a gap of 5 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 787-10 Dreamliner is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (560,000 lbs versus 158,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 787-10 Dreamliner is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,430 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The C919, at 2,200 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the C919's range, the 787-10 Dreamliner's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 787-10 Dreamliner leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
787-10 Dreamliner vs C919: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 787-10 Dreamliner or the C919?
The 787-10 Dreamliner has the longer published range — 6,430 nm versus 2,200 nm for the C919.
Does the 787-10 Dreamliner or C919 seat more passengers?
The 787-10 Dreamliner carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 440 seats, compared with 192 on the C919.
Which is faster, the 787-10 Dreamliner or the C919?
The 787-10 Dreamliner cruises faster, at 488 kt versus 447 kt for the C919.
Which is newer, the 787-10 Dreamliner or the C919?
The C919 is the newer design, introduced in 2023 versus 2018 for the 787-10 Dreamliner.
Is the 787-10 Dreamliner or the C919 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 787-10 Dreamliner is the larger aircraft — 560,000 lbs versus 158,700 lbs for the C919.
Should I buy the 787-10 Dreamliner or the C919?
On published specifications the 787-10 Dreamliner leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 787-10 Dreamliner vs C919?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.