182 Skylane vs P2010
The 182 Skylane leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
The Cessna / Textron Aviation 182 Skylane (introduced 1956) and the Tecnam P2010 (introduced 2013) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are piston singles, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. On paper they are closely matched, so the decision usually turns on cabin, economics and availability. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
182 Skylane vs P2010: the key differences
- The 182 Skylane delivers 3% more range (182 Skylane: 915 nm; P2010: 890 nm).
- The 182 Skylane delivers 5% more cruise speed (182 Skylane: 145 kt; P2010: 138 kt).
- The 182 Skylane and P2010 are evenly matched on passenger capacity, both at 4 seats.
- The P2010 is the newer design (introduced 2013 versus 1956 for the 182 Skylane), a gap of 57 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 182 Skylane is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (3,100 lbs versus 2,756 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the 182 Skylane seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 182 Skylane leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The P2010 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
182 Skylane vs P2010: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 182 Skylane or the P2010?
The 182 Skylane has the longer published range — 915 nm versus 890 nm for the P2010.
Which is faster, the 182 Skylane or the P2010?
The 182 Skylane cruises faster, at 145 kt versus 138 kt for the P2010.
Which is newer, the 182 Skylane or the P2010?
The P2010 is the newer design, introduced in 2013 versus 1956 for the 182 Skylane.
Is the 182 Skylane or the P2010 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 182 Skylane is the larger aircraft — 3,100 lbs versus 2,756 lbs for the P2010.
Should I buy the 182 Skylane or the P2010?
On published specifications the 182 Skylane leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The P2010 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 182 Skylane vs P2010?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.