Denali vs P.180 Avanti EVO
The P.180 Avanti EVO leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Cessna / Textron Aviation Denali (introduced 2025) beside the Piaggio Aerospace P.180 Avanti EVO (introduced 2014) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are turboprops, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the Denali has the advantage. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
Denali vs P.180 Avanti EVO: the key differences
- The Denali delivers 9% more range (Denali: 1,600 nm; P.180 Avanti EVO: 1,470 nm).
- The P.180 Avanti EVO delivers 41% more cruise speed (Denali: 285 kt; P.180 Avanti EVO: 402 kt).
- The Denali and P.180 Avanti EVO are evenly matched on passenger capacity, both at 9 seats.
- The Denali is the newer design (introduced 2025 versus 2014 for the P.180 Avanti EVO), a gap of 11 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The P.180 Avanti EVO is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (12,100 lbs versus 8,500 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the Denali runs 1 engine against 2 on the P.180 Avanti EVO — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for regional and short-to-medium legs, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the Denali seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Denali leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The P.180 Avanti EVO can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
Denali vs P.180 Avanti EVO: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the Denali or the P.180 Avanti EVO?
The Denali has the longer published range — 1,600 nm versus 1,470 nm for the P.180 Avanti EVO.
Which is faster, the Denali or the P.180 Avanti EVO?
The P.180 Avanti EVO cruises faster, at 402 kt versus 285 kt for the Denali.
Which is newer, the Denali or the P.180 Avanti EVO?
The Denali is the newer design, introduced in 2025 versus 2014 for the P.180 Avanti EVO.
Is the Denali or the P.180 Avanti EVO the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the P.180 Avanti EVO is the larger aircraft — 12,100 lbs versus 8,500 lbs for the Denali.
Should I buy the Denali or the P.180 Avanti EVO?
On published specifications the Denali leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The P.180 Avanti EVO can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the Denali vs P.180 Avanti EVO?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.