GA8 Airvan vs P-750 XSTOL
The P-750 XSTOL leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
The GippsAero GA8 Airvan (introduced 2000) and the Pacific Aerospace P-750 XSTOL (introduced 2001) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are utility, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the P-750 XSTOL has the advantage. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
GA8 Airvan vs P-750 XSTOL: the key differences
- The P-750 XSTOL delivers 55% more range (GA8 Airvan: 730 nm; P-750 XSTOL: 1,130 nm).
- The P-750 XSTOL delivers 17% more cruise speed (GA8 Airvan: 120 kt; P-750 XSTOL: 140 kt).
- The P-750 XSTOL delivers 25% more passenger capacity (GA8 Airvan: 8 seats; P-750 XSTOL: 10 seats).
- The P-750 XSTOL is the newer design (introduced 2001 versus 2000 for the GA8 Airvan), a gap of 1 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The P-750 XSTOL is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (7,500 lbs versus 4,000 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The P-750 XSTOL is the stronger fit for regional and short-to-medium legs — its 1,130 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The GA8 Airvan, at 730 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the GA8 Airvan's range, the P-750 XSTOL's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the P-750 XSTOL leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The GA8 Airvan can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
GA8 Airvan vs P-750 XSTOL: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the GA8 Airvan or the P-750 XSTOL?
The P-750 XSTOL has the longer published range — 1,130 nm versus 730 nm for the GA8 Airvan.
Does the GA8 Airvan or P-750 XSTOL seat more passengers?
The P-750 XSTOL carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 10 seats, compared with 8 on the GA8 Airvan.
Which is faster, the GA8 Airvan or the P-750 XSTOL?
The P-750 XSTOL cruises faster, at 140 kt versus 120 kt for the GA8 Airvan.
Which is newer, the GA8 Airvan or the P-750 XSTOL?
The P-750 XSTOL is the newer design, introduced in 2001 versus 2000 for the GA8 Airvan.
Is the GA8 Airvan or the P-750 XSTOL the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the P-750 XSTOL is the larger aircraft — 7,500 lbs versus 4,000 lbs for the GA8 Airvan.
Should I buy the GA8 Airvan or the P-750 XSTOL?
On published specifications the P-750 XSTOL leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The GA8 Airvan can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the GA8 Airvan vs P-750 XSTOL?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.