A321neo vs A340-600
The A340-600 leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
The Airbus A321neo (introduced 2017) and the Airbus A340-600 (introduced 2002) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the A340-600 has the advantage. undefined
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A321neo vs A340-600: the key differences
- The A340-600 delivers 88% more range (A321neo: 4,000 nm; A340-600: 7,500 nm).
- The A340-600 delivers 0% more cruise speed (A321neo: 487 kt; A340-600: 488 kt).
- The A340-600 delivers 56% more passenger capacity (A321neo: 244 seats; A340-600: 380 seats).
- The A321neo is the newer design (introduced 2017 versus 2002 for the A340-600), a gap of 15 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The A340-600 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (837,756 lbs versus 213,848 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the A321neo runs 2 engines against 4 on the A340-600 — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The A340-600 is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 7,500 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The A321neo, at 4,000 nm, is better matched to long-haul and transatlantic missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the A321neo's range, the A340-600's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the A340-600 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A321neo can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
A321neo vs A340-600: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A321neo or the A340-600?
The A340-600 has the longer published range — 7,500 nm versus 4,000 nm for the A321neo.
Does the A321neo or A340-600 seat more passengers?
The A340-600 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 380 seats, compared with 244 on the A321neo.
Which is faster, the A321neo or the A340-600?
The A340-600 cruises faster, at 488 kt versus 487 kt for the A321neo.
Which is newer, the A321neo or the A340-600?
The A321neo is the newer design, introduced in 2017 versus 2002 for the A340-600.
Is the A321neo or the A340-600 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the A340-600 is the larger aircraft — 837,756 lbs versus 213,848 lbs for the A321neo.
Should I buy the A321neo or the A340-600?
On published specifications the A340-600 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A321neo can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the A321neo vs A340-600?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.