A350-900 vs 767-300ER
The A350-900 leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
The Airbus A350-900 (introduced 2015) and the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 767-300ER (introduced 1988) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the A350-900 has the advantage. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A350-900 vs 767-300ER: the key differences
- The A350-900 delivers 27% more range (A350-900: 8,100 nm; 767-300ER: 6,385 nm).
- The A350-900 delivers 14% more cruise speed (A350-900: 521 kt; 767-300ER: 459 kt).
- The A350-900 delivers 25% more passenger capacity (A350-900: 440 seats; 767-300ER: 351 seats).
- The A350-900 is the newer design (introduced 2015 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER), a gap of 27 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The A350-900 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (617,295 lbs versus 412,775 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the A350-900 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the A350-900 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 767-300ER can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
A350-900 vs 767-300ER: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A350-900 or the 767-300ER?
The A350-900 has the longer published range — 8,100 nm versus 6,385 nm for the 767-300ER.
Does the A350-900 or 767-300ER seat more passengers?
The A350-900 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 440 seats, compared with 351 on the 767-300ER.
Which is faster, the A350-900 or the 767-300ER?
The A350-900 cruises faster, at 521 kt versus 459 kt for the 767-300ER.
Which is newer, the A350-900 or the 767-300ER?
The A350-900 is the newer design, introduced in 2015 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER.
Is the A350-900 or the 767-300ER the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the A350-900 is the larger aircraft — 617,295 lbs versus 412,775 lbs for the 767-300ER.
Should I buy the A350-900 or the 767-300ER?
On published specifications the A350-900 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 767-300ER can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the A350-900 vs 767-300ER?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.