HangarMart
CompareH125 vs S-92
Aircraft comparison

H125 vs S-92

The S-92 leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.

Put the Airbus Helicopters H125 (introduced 2015) beside the Sikorsky S-92 (introduced 2004) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are helicopters, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the S-92 carries more passengers. undefined

H125

Airbus Helicopters

H125

S-92

Sikorsky

S-92

Performance
Range
335 nm
539 nm
Cruise speed
130 kt
151 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
6
19
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
4,960 lbs
26,500 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
1 × Turboshaft
2 × Turboshaft
Engine model
Safran Arriel 2D
GE CT7-8A

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

H125 vs S-92: the key differences

  • The S-92 delivers 61% more range (H125: 335 nm; S-92: 539 nm).
  • The S-92 delivers 16% more cruise speed (H125: 130 kt; S-92: 151 kt).
  • The S-92 delivers 217% more passenger capacity (H125: 6 seats; S-92: 19 seats).
  • The H125 is the newer design (introduced 2015 versus 2004 for the S-92), a gap of 11 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
  • The S-92 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (26,500 lbs versus 4,960 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
  • The two differ in powerplant layout: the H125 runs 1 engine against 2 on the S-92 — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the S-92 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

On published specifications the S-92 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The H125 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

H125 vs S-92: FAQs

Which has the longer range, the H125 or the S-92?

The S-92 has the longer published range — 539 nm versus 335 nm for the H125.

Does the H125 or S-92 seat more passengers?

The S-92 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 19 seats, compared with 6 on the H125.

Which is faster, the H125 or the S-92?

The S-92 cruises faster, at 151 kt versus 130 kt for the H125.

Which is newer, the H125 or the S-92?

The H125 is the newer design, introduced in 2015 versus 2004 for the S-92.

Is the H125 or the S-92 the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the S-92 is the larger aircraft — 26,500 lbs versus 4,960 lbs for the H125.

Should I buy the H125 or the S-92?

On published specifications the S-92 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The H125 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

Still weighing up the H125 vs S-92?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works