H225 Super Puma vs R66 Turbine
The H225 Super Puma leads, topping 6 of 7 compared metrics.
The Airbus Helicopters H225 Super Puma (introduced 2004) and the Robinson Helicopter R66 Turbine (introduced 2010) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are helicopters, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the H225 Super Puma carries more passengers. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
H225 Super Puma vs R66 Turbine: the key differences
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 54% more range (H225 Super Puma: 540 nm; R66 Turbine: 350 nm).
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 29% more cruise speed (H225 Super Puma: 142 kt; R66 Turbine: 110 kt).
- The H225 Super Puma delivers 280% more passenger capacity (H225 Super Puma: 19 seats; R66 Turbine: 5 seats).
- The R66 Turbine is the newer design (introduced 2010 versus 2004 for the H225 Super Puma), a gap of 6 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (24,251 lbs versus 2,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the H225 Super Puma runs 2 engines against 1 on the R66 Turbine — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the H225 Super Puma seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The R66 Turbine can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
H225 Super Puma vs R66 Turbine: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the H225 Super Puma or the R66 Turbine?
The H225 Super Puma has the longer published range — 540 nm versus 350 nm for the R66 Turbine.
Does the H225 Super Puma or R66 Turbine seat more passengers?
The H225 Super Puma carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 19 seats, compared with 5 on the R66 Turbine.
Which is faster, the H225 Super Puma or the R66 Turbine?
The H225 Super Puma cruises faster, at 142 kt versus 110 kt for the R66 Turbine.
Which is newer, the H225 Super Puma or the R66 Turbine?
The R66 Turbine is the newer design, introduced in 2010 versus 2004 for the H225 Super Puma.
Is the H225 Super Puma or the R66 Turbine the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the H225 Super Puma is the larger aircraft — 24,251 lbs versus 2,700 lbs for the R66 Turbine.
Should I buy the H225 Super Puma or the R66 Turbine?
On published specifications the H225 Super Puma leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The R66 Turbine can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the H225 Super Puma vs R66 Turbine?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.