ATR 42-600 vs 1900D
The ATR 42-600 leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the ATR ATR 42-600 (introduced 2012) beside the Beechcraft / Textron Aviation 1900D (introduced 1991) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the ATR 42-600 carries more passengers. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
ATR 42-600 vs 1900D: the key differences
- The ATR 42-600 delivers 137% more range (ATR 42-600: 900 nm; 1900D: 380 nm).
- The ATR 42-600 delivers 7% more cruise speed (ATR 42-600: 300 kt; 1900D: 280 kt).
- The ATR 42-600 delivers 163% more passenger capacity (ATR 42-600: 50 seats; 1900D: 19 seats).
- The ATR 42-600 is the newer design (introduced 2012 versus 1991 for the 1900D), a gap of 21 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The ATR 42-600 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (41,226 lbs versus 17,120 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the ATR 42-600 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the ATR 42-600 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 1900D can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
ATR 42-600 vs 1900D: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the ATR 42-600 or the 1900D?
The ATR 42-600 has the longer published range — 900 nm versus 380 nm for the 1900D.
Does the ATR 42-600 or 1900D seat more passengers?
The ATR 42-600 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 50 seats, compared with 19 on the 1900D.
Which is faster, the ATR 42-600 or the 1900D?
The ATR 42-600 cruises faster, at 300 kt versus 280 kt for the 1900D.
Which is newer, the ATR 42-600 or the 1900D?
The ATR 42-600 is the newer design, introduced in 2012 versus 1991 for the 1900D.
Is the ATR 42-600 or the 1900D the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the ATR 42-600 is the larger aircraft — 41,226 lbs versus 17,120 lbs for the 1900D.
Should I buy the ATR 42-600 or the 1900D?
On published specifications the ATR 42-600 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 1900D can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the ATR 42-600 vs 1900D?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.