ATR 42-600 vs ERJ-145
The ERJ-145 leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
The ATR ATR 42-600 (introduced 2012) and the Embraer Executive Jets ERJ-145 (introduced 1996) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the ERJ-145 has the advantage. undefined
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
ATR 42-600 vs ERJ-145: the key differences
- The ERJ-145 delivers 72% more range (ATR 42-600: 900 nm; ERJ-145: 1,550 nm).
- The ERJ-145 delivers 50% more cruise speed (ATR 42-600: 300 kt; ERJ-145: 450 kt).
- The ATR 42-600 and ERJ-145 are evenly matched on passenger capacity, both at 50 seats.
- The ATR 42-600 is the newer design (introduced 2012 versus 1996 for the ERJ-145), a gap of 16 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The ERJ-145 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (48,501 lbs versus 41,226 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The ERJ-145 is the stronger fit for regional and short-to-medium legs — its 1,550 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The ATR 42-600, at 900 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the ATR 42-600's range, the ERJ-145's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
Choose the ERJ-145 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the ATR 42-600 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the ERJ-145 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
More comparisons
ATR 42-600 vs ERJ-145: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the ATR 42-600 or the ERJ-145?
The ERJ-145 has the longer published range — 1,550 nm versus 900 nm for the ATR 42-600.
Which is faster, the ATR 42-600 or the ERJ-145?
The ERJ-145 cruises faster, at 450 kt versus 300 kt for the ATR 42-600.
Which is newer, the ATR 42-600 or the ERJ-145?
The ATR 42-600 is the newer design, introduced in 2012 versus 1996 for the ERJ-145.
Is the ATR 42-600 or the ERJ-145 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the ERJ-145 is the larger aircraft — 48,501 lbs versus 41,226 lbs for the ATR 42-600.
Should I buy the ATR 42-600 or the ERJ-145?
Choose the ERJ-145 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the ATR 42-600 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the ERJ-145 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
Still weighing up the ATR 42-600 vs ERJ-145?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.