ATR 72-600 vs Embraer E175
The Embraer E175 leads, topping 7 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the ATR ATR 72-600 (introduced 2009) against the Embraer Executive Jets Embraer E175 (introduced 2005) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the Embraer E175 has the advantage. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
ATR 72-600 vs Embraer E175: the key differences
- The Embraer E175 delivers 167% more range (ATR 72-600: 825 nm; Embraer E175: 2,200 nm).
- The Embraer E175 delivers 63% more cruise speed (ATR 72-600: 275 kt; Embraer E175: 447 kt).
- The Embraer E175 delivers 13% more passenger capacity (ATR 72-600: 78 seats; Embraer E175: 88 seats).
- The ATR 72-600 is the newer design (introduced 2009 versus 2005 for the Embraer E175), a gap of 4 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Embraer E175 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (85,980 lbs versus 50,706 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The Embraer E175 is the stronger fit for transcontinental missions — its 2,200 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The ATR 72-600, at 825 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the ATR 72-600's range, the Embraer E175's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Embraer E175 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ATR 72-600 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
ATR 72-600 vs Embraer E175: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the ATR 72-600 or the Embraer E175?
The Embraer E175 has the longer published range — 2,200 nm versus 825 nm for the ATR 72-600.
Does the ATR 72-600 or Embraer E175 seat more passengers?
The Embraer E175 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 88 seats, compared with 78 on the ATR 72-600.
Which is faster, the ATR 72-600 or the Embraer E175?
The Embraer E175 cruises faster, at 447 kt versus 275 kt for the ATR 72-600.
Which is newer, the ATR 72-600 or the Embraer E175?
The ATR 72-600 is the newer design, introduced in 2009 versus 2005 for the Embraer E175.
Is the ATR 72-600 or the Embraer E175 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Embraer E175 is the larger aircraft — 85,980 lbs versus 50,706 lbs for the ATR 72-600.
Should I buy the ATR 72-600 or the Embraer E175?
On published specifications the Embraer E175 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ATR 72-600 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the ATR 72-600 vs Embraer E175?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.