King Air 260 vs M500
The King Air 260 leads, topping 7 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Beechcraft / Textron Aviation King Air 260 (introduced 2021) against the Piper Aircraft M500 (introduced 2015) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are turboprops, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the King Air 260 carries more passengers. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
King Air 260 vs M500: the key differences
- The King Air 260 delivers 72% more range (King Air 260: 1,720 nm; M500: 1,000 nm).
- The King Air 260 delivers 19% more cruise speed (King Air 260: 310 kt; M500: 260 kt).
- The King Air 260 delivers 80% more passenger capacity (King Air 260: 9 seats; M500: 5 seats).
- The King Air 260 is the newer design (introduced 2021 versus 2015 for the M500), a gap of 6 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The King Air 260 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (12,500 lbs versus 5,092 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the King Air 260 runs 2 engines against 1 on the M500 — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for regional and short-to-medium legs, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the King Air 260 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the King Air 260 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The M500 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
King Air 260 vs M500: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the King Air 260 or the M500?
The King Air 260 has the longer published range — 1,720 nm versus 1,000 nm for the M500.
Does the King Air 260 or M500 seat more passengers?
The King Air 260 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 9 seats, compared with 5 on the M500.
Which is faster, the King Air 260 or the M500?
The King Air 260 cruises faster, at 310 kt versus 260 kt for the M500.
Which is newer, the King Air 260 or the M500?
The King Air 260 is the newer design, introduced in 2021 versus 2015 for the M500.
Is the King Air 260 or the M500 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the King Air 260 is the larger aircraft — 12,500 lbs versus 5,092 lbs for the M500.
Should I buy the King Air 260 or the M500?
On published specifications the King Air 260 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The M500 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the King Air 260 vs M500?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.