737 MAX 9 vs 767-300ER
The 767-300ER leads, topping 7 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 737 MAX 9 (introduced 2018) against the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 767-300ER (introduced 1988) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the 767-300ER has the advantage. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
737 MAX 9 vs 767-300ER: the key differences
- The 767-300ER delivers 82% more range (737 MAX 9: 3,515 nm; 767-300ER: 6,385 nm).
- The 767-300ER delivers 1% more cruise speed (737 MAX 9: 453 kt; 767-300ER: 459 kt).
- The 767-300ER delivers 60% more passenger capacity (737 MAX 9: 220 seats; 767-300ER: 351 seats).
- The 737 MAX 9 is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER), a gap of 30 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 767-300ER is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (412,775 lbs versus 194,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 767-300ER is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,385 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The 737 MAX 9, at 3,515 nm, is better matched to long-haul and transatlantic missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the 737 MAX 9's range, the 767-300ER's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 737 MAX 9 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
737 MAX 9 vs 767-300ER: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 737 MAX 9 or the 767-300ER?
The 767-300ER has the longer published range — 6,385 nm versus 3,515 nm for the 737 MAX 9.
Does the 737 MAX 9 or 767-300ER seat more passengers?
The 767-300ER carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 351 seats, compared with 220 on the 737 MAX 9.
Which is faster, the 737 MAX 9 or the 767-300ER?
The 767-300ER cruises faster, at 459 kt versus 453 kt for the 737 MAX 9.
Which is newer, the 737 MAX 9 or the 767-300ER?
The 737 MAX 9 is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER.
Is the 737 MAX 9 or the 767-300ER the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 767-300ER is the larger aircraft — 412,775 lbs versus 194,700 lbs for the 737 MAX 9.
Should I buy the 737 MAX 9 or the 767-300ER?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 737 MAX 9 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 737 MAX 9 vs 767-300ER?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.