757-200 vs C919
The 757-200 leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 757-200 (introduced 1983) against the COMAC C919 (introduced 2023) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the 757-200 has the advantage. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
757-200 vs C919: the key differences
- The 757-200 delivers 78% more range (757-200: 3,915 nm; C919: 2,200 nm).
- The 757-200 delivers 2% more cruise speed (757-200: 458 kt; C919: 447 kt).
- The 757-200 delivers 24% more passenger capacity (757-200: 239 seats; C919: 192 seats).
- The C919 is the newer design (introduced 2023 versus 1983 for the 757-200), a gap of 40 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 757-200 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (255,000 lbs versus 158,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 757-200 is the stronger fit for long-haul and transatlantic missions — its 3,915 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The C919, at 2,200 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the C919's range, the 757-200's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 757-200 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
757-200 vs C919: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 757-200 or the C919?
The 757-200 has the longer published range — 3,915 nm versus 2,200 nm for the C919.
Does the 757-200 or C919 seat more passengers?
The 757-200 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 239 seats, compared with 192 on the C919.
Which is faster, the 757-200 or the C919?
The 757-200 cruises faster, at 458 kt versus 447 kt for the C919.
Which is newer, the 757-200 or the C919?
The C919 is the newer design, introduced in 2023 versus 1983 for the 757-200.
Is the 757-200 or the C919 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 757-200 is the larger aircraft — 255,000 lbs versus 158,700 lbs for the C919.
Should I buy the 757-200 or the C919?
On published specifications the 757-200 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 757-200 vs C919?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.