767-300ER vs C919
The 767-300ER leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 767-300ER (introduced 1988) beside the COMAC C919 (introduced 2023) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the 767-300ER has the advantage. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
767-300ER vs C919: the key differences
- The 767-300ER delivers 190% more range (767-300ER: 6,385 nm; C919: 2,200 nm).
- The 767-300ER delivers 3% more cruise speed (767-300ER: 459 kt; C919: 447 kt).
- The 767-300ER delivers 83% more passenger capacity (767-300ER: 351 seats; C919: 192 seats).
- The C919 is the newer design (introduced 2023 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER), a gap of 35 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 767-300ER is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (412,775 lbs versus 158,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 767-300ER is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,385 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The C919, at 2,200 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the C919's range, the 767-300ER's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
767-300ER vs C919: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 767-300ER or the C919?
The 767-300ER has the longer published range — 6,385 nm versus 2,200 nm for the C919.
Does the 767-300ER or C919 seat more passengers?
The 767-300ER carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 351 seats, compared with 192 on the C919.
Which is faster, the 767-300ER or the C919?
The 767-300ER cruises faster, at 459 kt versus 447 kt for the C919.
Which is newer, the 767-300ER or the C919?
The C919 is the newer design, introduced in 2023 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER.
Is the 767-300ER or the C919 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 767-300ER is the larger aircraft — 412,775 lbs versus 158,700 lbs for the C919.
Should I buy the 767-300ER or the C919?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The C919 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 767-300ER vs C919?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.