HangarMart
Compare152 vs Arrow
Aircraft comparison

152 vs Arrow

The Arrow leads, topping 6 of 7 compared metrics.

The Cessna / Textron Aviation 152 (introduced 1977) and the Piper Aircraft Arrow (introduced 1967) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are trainers, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the Arrow carries more passengers. undefined

152

Cessna / Textron Aviation

152

Arrow

Piper Aircraft

Arrow

Performance
Range
415 nm
786 nm
Cruise speed
107 kt
140 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
2
4
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
1,670 lbs
2,900 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
1 × Piston
1 × Piston
Engine model
Lycoming O-235-L2C
Lycoming IO-360-C1C6

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

152 vs Arrow: the key differences

  • The Arrow delivers 89% more range (152: 415 nm; Arrow: 786 nm).
  • The Arrow delivers 31% more cruise speed (152: 107 kt; Arrow: 140 kt).
  • The Arrow delivers 100% more passenger capacity (152: 2 seats; Arrow: 4 seats).
  • The 152 is the newer design (introduced 1977 versus 1967 for the Arrow), a gap of 10 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
  • The Arrow is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (2,900 lbs versus 1,670 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the Arrow seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

On published specifications the Arrow leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 152 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

152 vs Arrow: FAQs

Which has the longer range, the 152 or the Arrow?

The Arrow has the longer published range — 786 nm versus 415 nm for the 152.

Does the 152 or Arrow seat more passengers?

The Arrow carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 4 seats, compared with 2 on the 152.

Which is faster, the 152 or the Arrow?

The Arrow cruises faster, at 140 kt versus 107 kt for the 152.

Which is newer, the 152 or the Arrow?

The 152 is the newer design, introduced in 1977 versus 1967 for the Arrow.

Is the 152 or the Arrow the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the Arrow is the larger aircraft — 2,900 lbs versus 1,670 lbs for the 152.

Should I buy the 152 or the Arrow?

On published specifications the Arrow leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 152 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

Still weighing up the 152 vs Arrow?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works