185 Skywagon vs Kodiak 900
The Kodiak 900 leads, topping 6 of 7 compared metrics.
The Cessna / Textron Aviation 185 Skywagon (introduced 1961) and the Daher Kodiak Kodiak 900 (introduced 2023) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are utility, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the Kodiak 900 has the advantage. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
185 Skywagon vs Kodiak 900: the key differences
- The Kodiak 900 delivers 92% more range (185 Skywagon: 720 nm; Kodiak 900: 1,380 nm).
- The Kodiak 900 delivers 48% more cruise speed (185 Skywagon: 145 kt; Kodiak 900: 214 kt).
- The Kodiak 900 delivers 67% more passenger capacity (185 Skywagon: 6 seats; Kodiak 900: 10 seats).
- The Kodiak 900 is the newer design (introduced 2023 versus 1961 for the 185 Skywagon), a gap of 62 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Kodiak 900 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (8,500 lbs versus 3,350 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The Kodiak 900 is the stronger fit for regional and short-to-medium legs — its 1,380 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The 185 Skywagon, at 720 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the 185 Skywagon's range, the Kodiak 900's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Kodiak 900 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 185 Skywagon can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
185 Skywagon vs Kodiak 900: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 185 Skywagon or the Kodiak 900?
The Kodiak 900 has the longer published range — 1,380 nm versus 720 nm for the 185 Skywagon.
Does the 185 Skywagon or Kodiak 900 seat more passengers?
The Kodiak 900 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 10 seats, compared with 6 on the 185 Skywagon.
Which is faster, the 185 Skywagon or the Kodiak 900?
The Kodiak 900 cruises faster, at 214 kt versus 145 kt for the 185 Skywagon.
Which is newer, the 185 Skywagon or the Kodiak 900?
The Kodiak 900 is the newer design, introduced in 2023 versus 1961 for the 185 Skywagon.
Is the 185 Skywagon or the Kodiak 900 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Kodiak 900 is the larger aircraft — 8,500 lbs versus 3,350 lbs for the 185 Skywagon.
Should I buy the 185 Skywagon or the Kodiak 900?
On published specifications the Kodiak 900 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 185 Skywagon can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 185 Skywagon vs Kodiak 900?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.