Falcon 50EX vs Hawker 900XP
The Falcon 50EX leads, topping 7 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Dassault Aviation Falcon 50EX (introduced 1996) beside the Hawker Beechcraft Hawker 900XP (introduced 2007) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are business jets, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the Falcon 50EX carries more passengers. We line the numbers up below, then translate them into the mission each aircraft actually wins.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
Falcon 50EX vs Hawker 900XP: the key differences
- The Falcon 50EX delivers 10% more range (Falcon 50EX: 3,225 nm; Hawker 900XP: 2,930 nm).
- The Falcon 50EX delivers 2% more cruise speed (Falcon 50EX: 459 kt; Hawker 900XP: 448 kt).
- The Falcon 50EX delivers 13% more passenger capacity (Falcon 50EX: 9 seats; Hawker 900XP: 8 seats).
- The Hawker 900XP is the newer design (introduced 2007 versus 1996 for the Falcon 50EX), a gap of 11 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Falcon 50EX is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (40,780 lbs versus 28,000 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
- The two differ in powerplant layout: the Falcon 50EX runs 3 engines against 2 on the Hawker 900XP — a factor in redundancy, maintenance scope and operating cost.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for transcontinental missions, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the Falcon 50EX seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Falcon 50EX leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The Hawker 900XP can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
Falcon 50EX vs Hawker 900XP: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the Falcon 50EX or the Hawker 900XP?
The Falcon 50EX has the longer published range — 3,225 nm versus 2,930 nm for the Hawker 900XP.
Does the Falcon 50EX or Hawker 900XP seat more passengers?
The Falcon 50EX carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 9 seats, compared with 8 on the Hawker 900XP.
Which is faster, the Falcon 50EX or the Hawker 900XP?
The Falcon 50EX cruises faster, at 459 kt versus 448 kt for the Hawker 900XP.
Which is newer, the Falcon 50EX or the Hawker 900XP?
The Hawker 900XP is the newer design, introduced in 2007 versus 1996 for the Falcon 50EX.
Is the Falcon 50EX or the Hawker 900XP the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Falcon 50EX is the larger aircraft — 40,780 lbs versus 28,000 lbs for the Hawker 900XP.
Should I buy the Falcon 50EX or the Hawker 900XP?
On published specifications the Falcon 50EX leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The Hawker 900XP can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the Falcon 50EX vs Hawker 900XP?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.