HangarMart
CompareA220-300 vs A320neo
Aircraft comparison

A220-300 vs A320neo

The A320neo leads, topping 2 of 7 compared metrics.

Cross-shopping the Airbus A220-300 (introduced 2016) against the Airbus A320neo (introduced 2016) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the A320neo carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.

A220-300

Airbus

A220-300

A320neo

Airbus

A320neo

Performance
Range
3,400 nm
3,400 nm
Cruise speed
487 kt
487 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
160
194
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
167,551 lbs
187,393 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
2 × Turbofan
2 × Turbofan
Engine model
Pratt & Whitney PW1524G-3
CFM LEAP-1A26 / Pratt & Whitney PW1127G-JM

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

A220-300 vs A320neo: the key differences

  • The A220-300 and A320neo are evenly matched on range, both at 3,400 nm.
  • The A220-300 and A320neo are evenly matched on cruise speed, both at 487 kt.
  • The A320neo delivers 21% more passenger capacity (A220-300: 160 seats; A320neo: 194 seats).
  • The A320neo is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (187,393 lbs versus 167,551 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for transcontinental missions, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the A320neo seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

Choose the A220-300 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the A320neo when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

A220-300 vs A320neo: FAQs

Does the A220-300 or A320neo seat more passengers?

The A320neo carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 194 seats, compared with 160 on the A220-300.

Is the A220-300 or the A320neo the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the A320neo is the larger aircraft — 187,393 lbs versus 167,551 lbs for the A220-300.

Should I buy the A220-300 or the A320neo?

Choose the A220-300 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the A320neo when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

Still weighing up the A220-300 vs A320neo?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works