A220-300 vs A319neo
The A319neo leads, topping 2 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Airbus A220-300 (introduced 2016) against the Airbus A319neo (introduced 2018) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the A319neo has the advantage. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A220-300 vs A319neo: the key differences
- The A319neo delivers 10% more range (A220-300: 3,400 nm; A319neo: 3,750 nm).
- The A220-300 and A319neo are evenly matched on cruise speed, both at 487 kt.
- The A220-300 and A319neo are evenly matched on passenger capacity, both at 160 seats.
- The A319neo is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 2016 for the A220-300), a gap of 2 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The A220-300 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (167,551 lbs versus 166,449 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The A319neo is the stronger fit for long-haul and transatlantic missions — its 3,750 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The A220-300, at 3,400 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the A220-300's range, the A319neo's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
Choose the A319neo when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the A220-300 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
A220-300 vs A319neo: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A220-300 or the A319neo?
The A319neo has the longer published range — 3,750 nm versus 3,400 nm for the A220-300.
Which is newer, the A220-300 or the A319neo?
The A319neo is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 2016 for the A220-300.
Is the A220-300 or the A319neo the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the A220-300 is the larger aircraft — 167,551 lbs versus 166,449 lbs for the A319neo.
Should I buy the A220-300 or the A319neo?
Choose the A319neo when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the A220-300 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.
Still weighing up the A220-300 vs A319neo?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.