ATR 42-600 vs Embraer E190-E2
The Embraer E190-E2 leads, topping 7 of 7 compared metrics.
The ATR ATR 42-600 (introduced 2012) and the Embraer Executive Jets Embraer E190-E2 (introduced 2018) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the Embraer E190-E2 has the advantage. The spec-by-spec breakdown below is followed by a mission-fit read and a buyer's recommendation.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
ATR 42-600 vs Embraer E190-E2: the key differences
- The Embraer E190-E2 delivers 217% more range (ATR 42-600: 900 nm; Embraer E190-E2: 2,850 nm).
- The Embraer E190-E2 delivers 53% more cruise speed (ATR 42-600: 300 kt; Embraer E190-E2: 458 kt).
- The Embraer E190-E2 delivers 128% more passenger capacity (ATR 42-600: 50 seats; Embraer E190-E2: 114 seats).
- The Embraer E190-E2 is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 2012 for the ATR 42-600), a gap of 6 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Embraer E190-E2 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (124,341 lbs versus 41,226 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The Embraer E190-E2 is the stronger fit for transcontinental missions — its 2,850 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The ATR 42-600, at 900 nm, is better matched to short-haul and regional hops, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the ATR 42-600's range, the Embraer E190-E2's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Embraer E190-E2 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ATR 42-600 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
ATR 42-600 vs Embraer E190-E2: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the ATR 42-600 or the Embraer E190-E2?
The Embraer E190-E2 has the longer published range — 2,850 nm versus 900 nm for the ATR 42-600.
Does the ATR 42-600 or Embraer E190-E2 seat more passengers?
The Embraer E190-E2 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 114 seats, compared with 50 on the ATR 42-600.
Which is faster, the ATR 42-600 or the Embraer E190-E2?
The Embraer E190-E2 cruises faster, at 458 kt versus 300 kt for the ATR 42-600.
Which is newer, the ATR 42-600 or the Embraer E190-E2?
The Embraer E190-E2 is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 2012 for the ATR 42-600.
Is the ATR 42-600 or the Embraer E190-E2 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Embraer E190-E2 is the larger aircraft — 124,341 lbs versus 41,226 lbs for the ATR 42-600.
Should I buy the ATR 42-600 or the Embraer E190-E2?
On published specifications the Embraer E190-E2 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ATR 42-600 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the ATR 42-600 vs Embraer E190-E2?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.