HangarMart
Compare429 vs AW169
Aircraft comparison

429 vs AW169

429 and AW169 are closely matched, each topping 3 of 7 metrics.

The Bell Textron 429 (introduced 2009) and the Leonardo Helicopters AW169 (introduced 2015) are two aircraft buyers regularly weigh against each other. Both are helicopters, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the AW169 carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.

429

Bell Textron

429

AW169

Leonardo Helicopters

AW169

Performance
Range
411 nm
430 nm
Cruise speed
150 kt
145 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
8
10
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
7,000 lbs
10,630 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
2 × Turboshaft
2 × Turboshaft
Engine model
Pratt & Whitney Canada PW207D1
Pratt & Whitney Canada PW210A

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

429 vs AW169: the key differences

  • The AW169 delivers 5% more range (429: 411 nm; AW169: 430 nm).
  • The 429 delivers 3% more cruise speed (429: 150 kt; AW169: 145 kt).
  • The AW169 delivers 25% more passenger capacity (429: 8 seats; AW169: 10 seats).
  • The AW169 is the newer design (introduced 2015 versus 2009 for the 429), a gap of 6 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
  • The AW169 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (10,630 lbs versus 7,000 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the AW169 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

On published specifications the AW169 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 429 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

429 vs AW169: FAQs

Which has the longer range, the 429 or the AW169?

The AW169 has the longer published range — 430 nm versus 411 nm for the 429.

Does the 429 or AW169 seat more passengers?

The AW169 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 10 seats, compared with 8 on the 429.

Which is faster, the 429 or the AW169?

The 429 cruises faster, at 150 kt versus 145 kt for the AW169.

Which is newer, the 429 or the AW169?

The AW169 is the newer design, introduced in 2015 versus 2009 for the 429.

Is the 429 or the AW169 the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the AW169 is the larger aircraft — 10,630 lbs versus 7,000 lbs for the 429.

Should I buy the 429 or the AW169?

On published specifications the AW169 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 429 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.

Still weighing up the 429 vs AW169?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works