717-200 vs 767-300ER
The 767-300ER leads, topping 4 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 717-200 (introduced 1999) beside the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 767-300ER (introduced 1988) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the 767-300ER has the advantage. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
717-200 vs 767-300ER: the key differences
- The 767-300ER delivers 210% more range (717-200: 2,060 nm; 767-300ER: 6,385 nm).
- The 767-300ER delivers 5% more cruise speed (717-200: 438 kt; 767-300ER: 459 kt).
- The 767-300ER delivers 162% more passenger capacity (717-200: 134 seats; 767-300ER: 351 seats).
- The 717-200 is the newer design (introduced 1999 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER), a gap of 11 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 767-300ER is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (412,775 lbs versus 121,000 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 767-300ER is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,385 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The 717-200, at 2,060 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the 717-200's range, the 767-300ER's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 717-200 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
717-200 vs 767-300ER: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the 717-200 or the 767-300ER?
The 767-300ER has the longer published range — 6,385 nm versus 2,060 nm for the 717-200.
Does the 717-200 or 767-300ER seat more passengers?
The 767-300ER carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 351 seats, compared with 134 on the 717-200.
Which is faster, the 717-200 or the 767-300ER?
The 767-300ER cruises faster, at 459 kt versus 438 kt for the 717-200.
Which is newer, the 717-200 or the 767-300ER?
The 717-200 is the newer design, introduced in 1999 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER.
Is the 717-200 or the 767-300ER the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 767-300ER is the larger aircraft — 412,775 lbs versus 121,000 lbs for the 717-200.
Should I buy the 717-200 or the 767-300ER?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The 717-200 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the 717-200 vs 767-300ER?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.