Challenger 850 vs Phenom 300E
The Challenger 850 leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Bombardier Aviation Challenger 850 (introduced 2006) against the Embraer Executive Jets Phenom 300E (introduced 2018) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are business jets, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the Challenger 850 carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
Challenger 850 vs Phenom 300E: the key differences
- The Challenger 850 delivers 40% more range (Challenger 850: 2,811 nm; Phenom 300E: 2,010 nm).
- The Challenger 850 delivers 1% more cruise speed (Challenger 850: 459 kt; Phenom 300E: 453 kt).
- The Challenger 850 delivers 60% more passenger capacity (Challenger 850: 16 seats; Phenom 300E: 10 seats).
- The Phenom 300E is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 2006 for the Challenger 850), a gap of 12 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Challenger 850 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (53,000 lbs versus 17,968 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for transcontinental missions, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the Challenger 850 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Challenger 850 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The Phenom 300E can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
Challenger 850 vs Phenom 300E: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the Challenger 850 or the Phenom 300E?
The Challenger 850 has the longer published range — 2,811 nm versus 2,010 nm for the Phenom 300E.
Does the Challenger 850 or Phenom 300E seat more passengers?
The Challenger 850 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 16 seats, compared with 10 on the Phenom 300E.
Which is faster, the Challenger 850 or the Phenom 300E?
The Challenger 850 cruises faster, at 459 kt versus 453 kt for the Phenom 300E.
Which is newer, the Challenger 850 or the Phenom 300E?
The Phenom 300E is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 2006 for the Challenger 850.
Is the Challenger 850 or the Phenom 300E the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Challenger 850 is the larger aircraft — 53,000 lbs versus 17,968 lbs for the Phenom 300E.
Should I buy the Challenger 850 or the Phenom 300E?
On published specifications the Challenger 850 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The Phenom 300E can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the Challenger 850 vs Phenom 300E?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.