CRJ700 vs Embraer E170
CRJ700 and Embraer E170 are closely matched, each topping 2 of 7 metrics.
Cross-shopping the Bombardier Aviation CRJ700 (introduced 2001) against the Embraer Executive Jets Embraer E170 (introduced 2004) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the Embraer E170 has the advantage. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
CRJ700 vs Embraer E170: the key differences
- The Embraer E170 delivers 52% more range (CRJ700: 1,378 nm; Embraer E170: 2,100 nm).
- The CRJ700 delivers 6% more cruise speed (CRJ700: 473 kt; Embraer E170: 447 kt).
- The Embraer E170 delivers 3% more passenger capacity (CRJ700: 78 seats; Embraer E170: 80 seats).
- The Embraer E170 is the newer design (introduced 2004 versus 2001 for the CRJ700), a gap of 3 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The Embraer E170 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (82,012 lbs versus 75,000 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The Embraer E170 is the stronger fit for transcontinental missions — its 2,100 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The CRJ700, at 1,378 nm, is better matched to regional and short-to-medium legs, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the CRJ700's range, the Embraer E170's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the Embraer E170 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The CRJ700 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
CRJ700 vs Embraer E170: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the CRJ700 or the Embraer E170?
The Embraer E170 has the longer published range — 2,100 nm versus 1,378 nm for the CRJ700.
Does the CRJ700 or Embraer E170 seat more passengers?
The Embraer E170 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 80 seats, compared with 78 on the CRJ700.
Which is faster, the CRJ700 or the Embraer E170?
The CRJ700 cruises faster, at 473 kt versus 447 kt for the Embraer E170.
Which is newer, the CRJ700 or the Embraer E170?
The Embraer E170 is the newer design, introduced in 2004 versus 2001 for the CRJ700.
Is the CRJ700 or the Embraer E170 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the Embraer E170 is the larger aircraft — 82,012 lbs versus 75,000 lbs for the CRJ700.
Should I buy the CRJ700 or the Embraer E170?
On published specifications the Embraer E170 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The CRJ700 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the CRJ700 vs Embraer E170?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.