E175-E2 vs ERJ-145
The E175-E2 leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Embraer Executive Jets E175-E2 (introduced 2024) beside the Embraer Executive Jets ERJ-145 (introduced 1996) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are regional, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the E175-E2 carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
E175-E2 vs ERJ-145: the key differences
- The E175-E2 delivers 33% more range (E175-E2: 2,060 nm; ERJ-145: 1,550 nm).
- The E175-E2 delivers 4% more cruise speed (E175-E2: 470 kt; ERJ-145: 450 kt).
- The E175-E2 delivers 80% more passenger capacity (E175-E2: 90 seats; ERJ-145: 50 seats).
- The E175-E2 is the newer design (introduced 2024 versus 1996 for the ERJ-145), a gap of 28 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The E175-E2 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (98,768 lbs versus 48,501 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The E175-E2 is the stronger fit for transcontinental missions — its 2,060 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The ERJ-145, at 1,550 nm, is better matched to regional and short-to-medium legs, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the ERJ-145's range, the E175-E2's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the E175-E2 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ERJ-145 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
E175-E2 vs ERJ-145: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the E175-E2 or the ERJ-145?
The E175-E2 has the longer published range — 2,060 nm versus 1,550 nm for the ERJ-145.
Does the E175-E2 or ERJ-145 seat more passengers?
The E175-E2 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 90 seats, compared with 50 on the ERJ-145.
Which is faster, the E175-E2 or the ERJ-145?
The E175-E2 cruises faster, at 470 kt versus 450 kt for the ERJ-145.
Which is newer, the E175-E2 or the ERJ-145?
The E175-E2 is the newer design, introduced in 2024 versus 1996 for the ERJ-145.
Is the E175-E2 or the ERJ-145 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the E175-E2 is the larger aircraft — 98,768 lbs versus 48,501 lbs for the ERJ-145.
Should I buy the E175-E2 or the ERJ-145?
On published specifications the E175-E2 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The ERJ-145 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the E175-E2 vs ERJ-145?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.