HangarMart
CompareArcher LX vs P2008
Aircraft comparison

Archer LX vs P2008

Archer LX and P2008 are closely matched, each topping 3 of 7 metrics.

Put the Piper Aircraft Archer LX (introduced 2017) beside the Tecnam P2008 (introduced 2009) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are trainers, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the Archer LX carries more passengers. undefined

Archer LX

Piper Aircraft

Archer LX

P2008

Tecnam

P2008

Performance
Range
522 nm
720 nm
Cruise speed
128 kt
120 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
4
2
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
2,558 lbs
1,320 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
1 × Piston
1 × Piston
Engine model
Lycoming IO-360-B4A
Rotax 912iS Sport

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

Archer LX vs P2008: the key differences

  • The P2008 delivers 38% more range (Archer LX: 522 nm; P2008: 720 nm).
  • The Archer LX delivers 7% more cruise speed (Archer LX: 128 kt; P2008: 120 kt).
  • The Archer LX delivers 100% more passenger capacity (Archer LX: 4 seats; P2008: 2 seats).
  • The Archer LX is the newer design (introduced 2017 versus 2009 for the P2008), a gap of 8 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
  • The Archer LX is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (2,558 lbs versus 1,320 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for short-haul and regional hops, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the Archer LX seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

Choose the P2008 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the Archer LX when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the Archer LX holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

Archer LX vs P2008: FAQs

Which has the longer range, the Archer LX or the P2008?

The P2008 has the longer published range — 720 nm versus 522 nm for the Archer LX.

Does the Archer LX or P2008 seat more passengers?

The Archer LX carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 4 seats, compared with 2 on the P2008.

Which is faster, the Archer LX or the P2008?

The Archer LX cruises faster, at 128 kt versus 120 kt for the P2008.

Which is newer, the Archer LX or the P2008?

The Archer LX is the newer design, introduced in 2017 versus 2009 for the P2008.

Is the Archer LX or the P2008 the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the Archer LX is the larger aircraft — 2,558 lbs versus 1,320 lbs for the P2008.

Should I buy the Archer LX or the P2008?

Choose the P2008 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the Archer LX when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the Archer LX holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

Still weighing up the Archer LX vs P2008?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works