A220-300 vs 787-10 Dreamliner
The 787-10 Dreamliner leads, topping 6 of 7 compared metrics.
Put the Airbus A220-300 (introduced 2016) beside the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 787-10 Dreamliner (introduced 2018) and the trade-offs sharpen fast. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the 787-10 Dreamliner carries more passengers. undefined
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A220-300 vs 787-10 Dreamliner: the key differences
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 89% more range (A220-300: 3,400 nm; 787-10 Dreamliner: 6,430 nm).
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 0% more cruise speed (A220-300: 487 kt; 787-10 Dreamliner: 488 kt).
- The 787-10 Dreamliner delivers 175% more passenger capacity (A220-300: 160 seats; 787-10 Dreamliner: 440 seats).
- The 787-10 Dreamliner is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 2016 for the A220-300), a gap of 2 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 787-10 Dreamliner is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (560,000 lbs versus 167,551 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 787-10 Dreamliner is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,430 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The A220-300, at 3,400 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the A220-300's range, the 787-10 Dreamliner's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 787-10 Dreamliner leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A220-300 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
A220-300 vs 787-10 Dreamliner: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A220-300 or the 787-10 Dreamliner?
The 787-10 Dreamliner has the longer published range — 6,430 nm versus 3,400 nm for the A220-300.
Does the A220-300 or 787-10 Dreamliner seat more passengers?
The 787-10 Dreamliner carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 440 seats, compared with 160 on the A220-300.
Which is faster, the A220-300 or the 787-10 Dreamliner?
The 787-10 Dreamliner cruises faster, at 488 kt versus 487 kt for the A220-300.
Which is newer, the A220-300 or the 787-10 Dreamliner?
The 787-10 Dreamliner is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 2016 for the A220-300.
Is the A220-300 or the 787-10 Dreamliner the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 787-10 Dreamliner is the larger aircraft — 560,000 lbs versus 167,551 lbs for the A220-300.
Should I buy the A220-300 or the 787-10 Dreamliner?
On published specifications the 787-10 Dreamliner leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A220-300 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the A220-300 vs 787-10 Dreamliner?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.