HangarMart
CompareA220-300 vs C919
Aircraft comparison

A220-300 vs C919

The A220-300 leads, topping 3 of 7 compared metrics.

Cross-shopping the Airbus A220-300 (introduced 2016) against the COMAC C919 (introduced 2023) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is range, where the A220-300 has the advantage. undefined

A220-300

Airbus

A220-300

Performance
Range
3,400 nm
2,200 nm
Cruise speed
487 kt
447 kt
Max speed
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Service ceiling
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Rate of climb
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Capacity & dimensions
Max seats
160
192
Crew
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Max takeoff weight
167,551 lbs
158,700 lbs
Length
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Cabin height
Locked — sign in to view
Locked — sign in to view
Powerplant
Engines
2 × Turbofan
2 × Turbofan
Engine model
Pratt & Whitney PW1524G-3
CFM International LEAP-1C

6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.

A220-300 vs C919: the key differences

  • The A220-300 delivers 55% more range (A220-300: 3,400 nm; C919: 2,200 nm).
  • The A220-300 delivers 9% more cruise speed (A220-300: 487 kt; C919: 447 kt).
  • The C919 delivers 20% more passenger capacity (A220-300: 160 seats; C919: 192 seats).
  • The C919 is the newer design (introduced 2023 versus 2016 for the A220-300), a gap of 7 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
  • The A220-300 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (167,551 lbs versus 158,700 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.

Which mission suits which aircraft

Both aircraft are built for transcontinental missions, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the C919 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.

Which should you choose?

Choose the A220-300 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the C919 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

A220-300 vs C919: FAQs

Which has the longer range, the A220-300 or the C919?

The A220-300 has the longer published range — 3,400 nm versus 2,200 nm for the C919.

Does the A220-300 or C919 seat more passengers?

The C919 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 192 seats, compared with 160 on the A220-300.

Which is faster, the A220-300 or the C919?

The A220-300 cruises faster, at 487 kt versus 447 kt for the C919.

Which is newer, the A220-300 or the C919?

The C919 is the newer design, introduced in 2023 versus 2016 for the A220-300.

Is the A220-300 or the C919 the larger aircraft?

By maximum takeoff weight the A220-300 is the larger aircraft — 167,551 lbs versus 158,700 lbs for the C919.

Should I buy the A220-300 or the C919?

Choose the A220-300 when nonstop range is the deciding factor, and the C919 when cabin capacity and payload matter more; the A220-300 holds the cruise-speed edge. The right answer ultimately depends on acquisition cost, maintenance-program status, and what is actually available on the market — talk to our acquisition advisory team to pressure-test the choice against your missions and budget.

Still weighing up the A220-300 vs C919?

Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.

How advisory works