A319neo vs 757-200
The 757-200 leads, topping 3 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Airbus A319neo (introduced 2018) against the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 757-200 (introduced 1983) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the 757-200 carries more passengers. undefined
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A319neo vs 757-200: the key differences
- The 757-200 delivers 4% more range (A319neo: 3,750 nm; 757-200: 3,915 nm).
- The A319neo delivers 6% more cruise speed (A319neo: 487 kt; 757-200: 458 kt).
- The 757-200 delivers 49% more passenger capacity (A319neo: 160 seats; 757-200: 239 seats).
- The A319neo is the newer design (introduced 2018 versus 1983 for the 757-200), a gap of 35 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 757-200 is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (255,000 lbs versus 166,449 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
Both aircraft are built for long-haul and transatlantic missions, so outright range rarely separates them — the call leans on cabin (the 757-200 seats more), trip economics and what is actually available on the market. Match the airframe to how you fly most weeks, not to the headline range figure.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 757-200 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A319neo can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
A319neo vs 757-200: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A319neo or the 757-200?
The 757-200 has the longer published range — 3,915 nm versus 3,750 nm for the A319neo.
Does the A319neo or 757-200 seat more passengers?
The 757-200 carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 239 seats, compared with 160 on the A319neo.
Which is faster, the A319neo or the 757-200?
The A319neo cruises faster, at 487 kt versus 458 kt for the 757-200.
Which is newer, the A319neo or the 757-200?
The A319neo is the newer design, introduced in 2018 versus 1983 for the 757-200.
Is the A319neo or the 757-200 the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 757-200 is the larger aircraft — 255,000 lbs versus 166,449 lbs for the A319neo.
Should I buy the A319neo or the 757-200?
On published specifications the 757-200 leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A319neo can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the A319neo vs 757-200?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.