A220-100 vs 767-300ER
The 767-300ER leads, topping 5 of 7 compared metrics.
Cross-shopping the Airbus A220-100 (introduced 2016) against the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 767-300ER (introduced 1988) is a common decision, and the two sit closer on paper than the badges suggest. Both are commercial, which makes them natural cross-shopping rivals. The clearest separation between them is cabin capacity, where the 767-300ER carries more passengers. Below we compare them spec by spec, then break down which aircraft suits which mission.
6 more specs per aircraft — ceiling, climb, cabin, dimensions and more — are free with an account.
A220-100 vs 767-300ER: the key differences
- The 767-300ER delivers 88% more range (A220-100: 3,400 nm; 767-300ER: 6,385 nm).
- The A220-100 delivers 6% more cruise speed (A220-100: 487 kt; 767-300ER: 459 kt).
- The 767-300ER delivers 160% more passenger capacity (A220-100: 135 seats; 767-300ER: 351 seats).
- The A220-100 is the newer design (introduced 2016 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER), a gap of 28 years that usually shows up in avionics, cabin systems and fuel burn.
- The 767-300ER is the larger aircraft by maximum takeoff weight (412,775 lbs versus 149,914 lbs), which typically buys more cabin and payload at the cost of higher trip economics.
Which mission suits which aircraft
The 767-300ER is the stronger fit for nonstop ultra-long-haul routes — its 6,385 nm of range removes fuel stops on those legs. The A220-100, at 3,400 nm, is better matched to transcontinental missions, where lower trip cost counts for more than outright reach. If most of your flying sits inside the A220-100's range, the 767-300ER's extra capability is range you pay to carry but rarely use.
Which should you choose?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A220-100 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
More comparisons
A220-100 vs 767-300ER: FAQs
Which has the longer range, the A220-100 or the 767-300ER?
The 767-300ER has the longer published range — 6,385 nm versus 3,400 nm for the A220-100.
Does the A220-100 or 767-300ER seat more passengers?
The 767-300ER carries more passengers at maximum configuration — up to 351 seats, compared with 135 on the A220-100.
Which is faster, the A220-100 or the 767-300ER?
The A220-100 cruises faster, at 487 kt versus 459 kt for the 767-300ER.
Which is newer, the A220-100 or the 767-300ER?
The A220-100 is the newer design, introduced in 2016 versus 1988 for the 767-300ER.
Is the A220-100 or the 767-300ER the larger aircraft?
By maximum takeoff weight the 767-300ER is the larger aircraft — 412,775 lbs versus 149,914 lbs for the A220-100.
Should I buy the A220-100 or the 767-300ER?
On published specifications the 767-300ER leads on both range and cabin capacity, so it suits operators who want maximum mission flexibility from a single airframe. The A220-100 can still be the smarter buy on acquisition cost, operating economics, runway performance, or current availability — the factors that rarely show up in a spec sheet. Our acquisition advisory team can model both against your actual mission profile before you commit.
Still weighing up the A220-100 vs 767-300ER?
Specs only take you so far. Our advisors give an independent recommendation based on your mission, budget and how you actually fly — and represent your side through to purchase.